Objectives: To offer participants a broad perspective on the use of e-proctoring software for test and exam administration in order to support a culture of academic integrity in educational institutions.


  • What is e-proctoring software? 
  • Which are the most common functions of e-proctoring software?
  • How does e-proctoring software work?
  • What assumptions does e-proctoring software make?
  • What are the benefits of using e-proctoring software? 
  • How can we assess the e-proctoring software impact?
  • What are the costs and downsides of using e-proctoring software?
  • From the student perspective, How does it feel to be proctored?
  • What alternatives do we have to e-proctoring software to support academic integrity?

Moderator: Paul Sopcak (), MacEwan University, Canada


  • Sarah Elaine Eaton (), Associate Professor @ Werklund School of Education; Educational Leader in Residence; & Academic Integrity @ University of Calgary, Canada. Also Co-Editor-in-Chief of the “International Journal for Educational Integrity” & Co-Editor and Co-Founder of the “Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity”.
  • Tod Denham (), Exams Department Supervisor @ Thompson Rivers University, Open Learning, Canada.
  • Jacob Binstein (), Jacob Binstein works as a software engineer in New Jersey, and at the end of December will be receiving his MBA from the New Jersey Institute of Technology, which he attended online. He wrote a popular article on trivially bypassing proctor software in 2015 and has continued to research the digital proctoring space since.
  • Alycia Stewart (), Vice President Academic, Students’ Association of MacEwan University (SAMU), Canada.
  • Jean Guerrero-Dib (), Director of the Center for Academic Integrity and Ethics @ Universidad de Monterrey, México.

Webinar Link