E-proctoring discussion 2.0

Learning Outcomes:

Learn more about what to consider before implementing e-proctoring software
Explore Alternatives to e-proctoring
Understand the importance of faculty/instructor and student engagement in both online learning and in-person
Learn how some higher education institutions are managing e-proctoring academic misconduct cases and the challenges associated with the rise in cases
Appreciate that a reactive approach is less effective on academic misconduct than taking a proactive or educational approach

Presenters:

Jake Binstein (Software Engineer, e-proctoring researcher, U.S.)
Azalea Hulbert (Director, Office of Academic Integrity, West Virginia University, U.S.)
James Orr (Vice Provost for Academic Affairs and Strategic Enrollment, University of Memphis, U.S.)
Ceceilia Parnther (Assistant Professor, Administrative and Instructional Leadership, School of Ed., St. John’s University, NY, U.S.)
Camilla Roberts (Director, Honor and Integrity System, Kansas State University and President of ICAI, U.S.)
Paul Sopack (Coordinator, Office of Student Conduct, Community Standards & Values, MacEwan University, Canada)
Alycia Stewart, Vice President Academic, Students’ Association of MacEwan University

Moderator:

Amanda McKenzie, Director Quality Assurance (Academic Programs), University of Waterloo

It’s difficult to keep up with AI in education.

ICAI colleagues, I hope this blogpost finds you well and utilizing your academic break for rest and rejuvenation.

Promoting and supporting academic integrity in higher education (HE) is a complex endeavour that requires ...